Tuesday, June 26, 2012

My opinion on guns

I think people should adopt a position related to firearms based on facts and evidence and not include personal preference or extremist organization with a personal axe to grind.

We already have enough laws and regulations regarding guns and efforts should be directed to enforce these existing laws.  This includes federal laws and additional regulations enacted by each state [2].   Without considering guns, crimes such as murder, robbery, rape, and other violent crimes are currently illegal in every state.  In Addition, using a gun in the commission of a crime will usually receive an enhanced sentence which can vary by state, but has resulted in an average of on additional 5 years [5].  Guns and accessories (Ammo) are also illegal for those convicted of misdemeanor domestic violent [9]. 

According to FBI statistics, violent crime rates in the United States have been declining for at least the past decade  [1].    This drop has occurred during the same time when purchasing a gun has become easier as a result of the expiration of the “Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection act” (Assault weapons ban) in 2004. [6]   Violent crimes have continued to drop even as states began allowing citizens to carry firearms for personal protection with a “carrying a concealed weapon” permit (CCW) starting with Florida in 1987.   Currently only one state and Washington DC don’t have a CCW law.  [4]    

In addition to more guns being available [6] and more citizens carrying weapons [4] it has been argued that more guns has equaled less crime.    Although the report on this idea has some dispute, no scholar claim that legalizing causes more crime and many of the key points have been confirmed.  [8]   Even the CDC has reported that the Assault weapons ban or any current law had little measureable effect on violent crime.  [7]  It seems unfair to classify the United States as a country who has “seen so much gun violence” when the facts don’t support that conclusion.

The so called “gun show loophole” is non-existent.  I had previously asked what this “loop hole” was since I have heard many definitions which some have included all sales at gun shows.  I was also told that no evidence exists for the current platform position.  Currently felons and other prohibited people (mentally unstable, domestic abuse) trying to buy a gun through legal channels is illegal.   Any federal firearms licensed (FFL) dealer must perform an NICS check on the possible buyer before the transaction can be completed.  This has replaced the “waiting period” and bans people sentenced to more than 1 year, fugitive of justice, drug user, mentally defective, illegal alien, dishonorable discharge, renounced citizenship, VPO, or a felon. [10] Furthermore, anyone assisting a firearm purchase where the end user can’t purchase one on their own is called a “straw buy”.    This is also illegal where the end user, buyer, and seller could be charged with a crime.  [3]    According to current statistics guns were used in only 7% of violent crimes and 80% of the guns used were obtained through family or other illegal source.  Only about 2% of these guns were obtained through a flea market or gun show.  [5]    

In fact one of the founders of one of the more extreme “anti-gun” organizations, the Brady Campaign, was shot protecting President Regan from a repeating offender with a history of mental illness who purchased the firearm through a pawn shop with false information.   Adding more firearm regulations would only affect law abiding citizens since it appears people inclined to break the law have little respect for any law.  
I know some will say that wikipedia is not a valid reference.   I've looked at the sources in the referenced articles and they are correct.   So pretend I listed the 40+ references contained in those articles.

Reference